RANCHI, India, Sept. 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 4: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hariharganj P.S. Case No. 49/2025 corresponding to POCSO Case No. 54/2025, for the offences registered under Sections 64(1), 96 & 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Exclusive Spl. Judge, POCSO Act, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Petitioner is alleged to have enticed away the mino...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 4: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 67/2025, for the offences registered under Sections 123, 103(1), 61(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Petitioner is wife of the deceased Ashish Kishore. She used to reside in her parental house with the deceased. It is alleged tha...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks permission to amend the prayer clause. 2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. 3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in which the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the Notice Inviting Tender (for short 'NIT')/very short term tender dated 02.07.2025 issued by respondent no. 4 for preparing voter list/e...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the short term tender notice dated 02.07.2025, bearing PR No. 007741 (Election) 2025-26, issued under the signature of District Election Officer-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi by which, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, the work under agreement dated 20t...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 15.02.2011 passed by One-Man Enquiry Committee, Patna in Case No.126 of 2010 and further for issuance of a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioners to their post. 3. Counsel further submits that One-Man ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:- "1. To quash the order contained in Memo No.7036 dated 17.05.2016 issued by Additional Secretary to Government, General Administration Department, by which the representation dated 27.01.2015 submitted by the petitioner against Departmental Enquir...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved with the order, as contained in Memo No. 402 dated 20.03.2025, issued under the signature of respondent no.3 by which the nomination of the petitioners as Home Guard has been canceled. The petitioners have also sought quashing of the consequential order whereby the aforenoted order has been communicated to them. 3. Besides the various submissions made by the l...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: 1. The petitioner has filed the Writ petition for the following reliefs: "I). For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 30/12/17 passed by the Certificate Officer Bagaha in Certificate Case No. 49 of 2016-17, whereby and where under a warrant has been issued against the petitioner (Annexure-3) and further to quashing the entire certificate proceeding as the same is vitiated in...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the present writ petition has been filed in the year 2012 for payment of salary of 6 months from 03.07.1999 to 29.12.1999 before his joining in the Director of Indian System of Medicine, Bihar till his posting which has been held due to waiting for post...
PATNA, India, Sept. 3 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 3: Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners, who are the aspirants for the post of Home Guard in terms with Advertisement no. 02 of 2011, approached this Court seeking quashing of the final merit list of the Home Guard duly prepared at the block level, instead of district level contrary to the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Manjay Kumar & Another Vs. The State of Bihar & Others (C.W.J.C. No. 11645 of 2...